20.3
43.6 %
64.8 %
Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.
Overall Web of Science coverage for peer reviewed publications in this unit is poor, 43.6%.
Note that the coverage numbers for Web of Science and Scopus apply to publications in the KTH bibliometric database Bibmet. If a WoS-id or Scoupus-id from DiVA can not be matched in Bibmet, it does not count as covered.
The bibliometric indicators referred are based on publications registered in DiVA. Only publications from currently employed researchers at KTH are included. The rolling nature of this report means that it provides more of a current overview and less of a historic stable trend, since it excludes publications written by researchers that are no longer affiliated to KTH, but have been at some point in time.
Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.
Publication data is available only after login.
| DiVA publication type | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | Publications | WoS coverage | Scopus coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article, peer review | 4.2 | 2.9 | 4.7 | 5.1 | 5.0 | 6.4 | 4.6 | 32.9 | 57.8% | 0.9 |
| Article, other | NA | NA | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 2.0 | NA | 4.2 | 23.6% | 0.2 |
| Conference paper, peer review | 2.3 | 8.3 | 4.8 | 5.9 | 10.4 | 6.8 | 7.6 | 46.0 | 33.4% | 0.5 |
| Conference paper, other | 4.1 | 2.6 | 4.1 | 4.4 | 5.6 | 6.2 | 3.0 | 30.1 | 0.0% | 0.0 |
| Book | 0.2 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.0% | 0.2 |
| Anthology (editor) | NA | NA | 0.2 | NA | 0.3 | 0.5 | NA | 1.1 | 0.0% | 0.5 |
| Chapter in book | NA | 3.2 | 5.6 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 3.7 | 3.2 | 17.7 | 2.8% | 0.5 |
| Proceeding (editor) | NA | NA | 0.6 | 1.2 | 0.1 | NA | 0.2 | 2.2 | 0.0% | 0.0 |
| Report | 1.8 | 1.0 | 0.7 | NA | NA | 0.2 | 1.0 | 4.8 | 0.0% | 0.0 |
| Doctoral thesis | 2.0 | 1.0 | NA | 1.0 | NA | 1.0 | NA | 5.0 | 0.0% | 0.0 |
| Licentiate thesis | NA | 1.0 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1.0 | 0.0% | 0.0 |
| DiVA publication type | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | Publications | WoS coverage | Scopus coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article, peer review | 9 | 5 | 13 | 11 | 9 | 18 | 10 | 75 | 58.7% | 1 |
| Article, other | NA | NA | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | NA | 6 | 16.7% | 0 |
| Conference paper, peer review | 5 | 15 | 8 | 17 | 24 | 19 | 16 | 104 | 36.5% | 0 |
| Conference paper, other | 8 | 6 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 6 | 60 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Book | 1 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 2 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Anthology (editor) | NA | NA | 1 | NA | 1 | 2 | NA | 4 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Chapter in book | NA | 4 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 7 | 38 | 2.6% | 1 |
| Proceeding (editor) | NA | NA | 2 | 2 | 1 | NA | 2 | 7 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Report | 4 | 2 | 1 | NA | NA | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Doctoral thesis | 2 | 1 | NA | 1 | NA | 1 | NA | 5 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Licentiate thesis | NA | 1 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Publication Year | Publications | Total Citations | Average Citations | Uncited publications | Share uncited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 1.0 | 2.3 | 59.6% |
| 2015 | 2.1 | 2.9 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 31.7% |
| 2016 | 2.3 | 2.6 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 52.7% |
| 2017 | 4.3 | 3.0 | 0.7 | 3.6 | 82.7% |
| 2018 | 9.4 | 18.8 | 2.0 | 3.8 | 40.9% |
| Total | 22.0 | 31.2 | 1.4 | 11.6 | 52.8% |
| Publication years | Publications | Average Cf | Top 10% publications | Share Top 10% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 6.6 | 0.68 | 0.5 | 7.6% |
| 2015-2017 | 4.4 | 0.79 | 0.5 | 11.3% |
| 2016-2018 | 7.7 | 0.71 | 0.0 | 0.6% |
| 2017-2019 | 10.3 | 0.74 | 0.2 | 1.9% |
| Total | 16.9 | 0.71 | 0.7 | 4.1% |
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article, Proceedings paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 6 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 18.5%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 11 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 34.8%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
| Publication years | Publications | Average Journal Cf | Publications in Top 20% journals | Share Top 20% journals |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 6.6 | 0.89 | 0.6 | 8.5% |
| 2015-2017 | 4.4 | 0.92 | 0.4 | 10.0% |
| 2016-2018 | 7.7 | 0.84 | 1.1 | 14.5% |
| 2017-2019 | 10.3 | 0.97 | 1.9 | 18.7% |
| 2018-2020 | 11.7 | 1.00 | 2.6 | 22.6% |
| Total | 19.0 | 0.97 | 3.5 | 18.2% |
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 11 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 34.8%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
| Publication years | Publications | Swedish non-university co-publications | Share Swedish non-university | International co-publications | Share international |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 14 | 2 | 14.3% | 3 | 21.4% |
| 2015-2017 | 11 | 3 | 27.3% | 3 | 27.3% |
| 2016-2018 | 15 | 3 | 20.0% | 4 | 26.7% |
| 2017-2019 | 23 | 3 | 13.0% | 10 | 43.5% |
| 2018-2020 | 28 | 5 | 17.9% | 14 | 50.0% |
| Total | 44 | 8 | 18.2% | 18 | 40.9% |
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 11 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 37.9%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
| Country | Publications | 1-10 auth | 11-50 auth | 51-200 auth | Over 200 auth | Publications (frac) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.0 |
| United States | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2.1 |
| Norway | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.2 |
| Denmark | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.2 |
| Tanzania | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.0 |
| Finland | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1.0 |
| Italy | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.9 |
| Germany | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.7 |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.6 |
| Greece | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| Republic of Serbia | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Belgium | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| China | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| France | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Singapore | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Australia | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Canada | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Netherlands | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Brazil | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Japan | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Spain | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Organization | Organization type | Country | Publications | 1-10 auth | 11-50 auth | 51-200 auth | Over 200 auth | Publications (frac) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Athlone Institute of Technology (AIT) | University Other | Ireland | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.7 |
| Stockholm University | University | Sweden | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.8 |
| Linnaeus University | University | Sweden | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.5 |
| Uppsala University | University | Sweden | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.4 |
| University of Agder | University | Norway | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.2 |
| University of Dar Es Salaam | University | Tanzania | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.0 |
| University of Limerick | University | Ireland | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.0 |
| Aalborg University | University | Denmark | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.8 |
| Purdue University | University | United States | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.8 |
| Knowledge Foundation (KK-stiftelsen) | Other Public | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.7 |
| Hofstra University | University | United States | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Technopolis Group | Company | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University | University | United States | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Petestep AB | Company | Sweden | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| BioMediTech | Institute | Finland | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| University of Copenhagen | University | Denmark | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| National Technical University of Athens | University | Greece | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| University of Belgrade | University | Republic of Serbia | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| CAG Novus | NA | Sweden | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| University of Naples Federico II | University | Italy | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| Albaha University | University | Saudi Arabia | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| University of Helsinki | University | Finland | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Wallenius Marine AB | Company | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| University of Trieste | University | Italy | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Robert Gordon University (RGU) | University | United Kingdom | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| DNV GL | Company | Germany | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Mälardalen University College | University College | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Seaware AB | Company | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Catholic University of Leuven | University | Belgium | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Karlsruhe Institute of Technology | University | Germany | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Polytechnic University of Turin | University | Italy | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Trinity College, Dublin | University | Ireland | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Karolinska Institutet | University | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Nanjing Forestry University | University | China | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Scania AB | Company | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Stevens Institute of Technology | University | United States | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| University of Duisburg-Essen | University | Germany | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| University of Jyvaskyla | University | Finland | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Directorate General of Armaments | Other Public | France | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Chalmers University of Technology | University | Sweden | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| University of Lapland | University | Finland | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Brookes Bell | Company | United Kingdom | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Nanyang Technological University | University | Singapore | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Swedish Defence Research Agency | Institute | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Gannon University | University | United States | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Michigan Technological University (MTU) | University | United States | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| University of Florida | University | United States | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| University of New Hampshire | University | United States | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Arizona State University | University | United States | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Charles Sturt University | University | Australia | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Clemson University | University | United States | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Delft University of Technology | University | Netherlands | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Iowa State University | University | United States | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Linköping University | University | Sweden | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Pennsylvania State University | University | United States | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Univ TELUQ | University | Canada | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| University College London | University | United Kingdom | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| University of Michigan | University | United States | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| University of San Diego | University | United States | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) | University | Brazil | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Kobe University | University | Japan | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| NAPA | Company | Finland | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| National Defense Academy of Japan (NDA) | University | Japan | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Singapore Institute of Technology (SIT) | University | Singapore | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| University of A Coruña | University | Spain | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| University of Strathclyde | University | United Kingdom | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Publication Year | Publications | Open Access publications | OA gold | OA hybrid | OA green | OA bronze | Not OA | Share OA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 14.3% |
| 2015 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 33.3% |
| 2016 | 20 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 25.0% |
| 2017 | 14 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 7 | 50.0% |
| 2018 | 20 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 40.0% |
| 2019 | 32 | 24 | 4 | 13 | 6 | 1 | 8 | 75.0% |
| 2020 | 24 | 13 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 54.2% |
| Total | 123 | 60 | 10 | 24 | 19 | 7 | 63 | 48.8% |
The Open Access type of the publications was fetched from the Unpaywall REST API. The method to determine the OA type is presented here.
In summary, the different OA types can be described as follows:
Gold: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is fully OA.
Hybrid: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is not fully OA.
Green: The full text has been found in an institutional repository, such as DiVA.
Bronze: The full text has been found on a publisher website but no OA license could be identified.
N.B.: This table is based on peer-reviewed publications for which Unpaywall could determine the OA type (necessary condition: have a DOI number). Unpaywall’s method is empirical and does not strictly equate to copyright license. As a consequence, the OA status of a given publication may vary with time — for example turning from “Not OA” to “Green” when a full text is added to DiVA.
| Publication Year | Publications | Total Citations | Average Citations | Uncited publications | Share uncited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 6.1 | 82.5 | 13.6 | 3.2 | 52.1% |
| 2015 | 5.4 | 35.4 | 6.5 | 2.0 | 36.9% |
| 2016 | 5.0 | 25.1 | 5.0 | 1.6 | 31.7% |
| 2017 | 6.1 | 13.2 | 2.2 | 1.8 | 30.1% |
| 2018 | 9.4 | 35.0 | 3.7 | 3.9 | 41.2% |
| 2019 | 11.0 | 20.9 | 1.9 | 4.0 | 35.8% |
| 2020 | 8.5 | 11.2 | 1.3 | 4.6 | 55.0% |
| Total | 51.5 | 223.3 | 4.3 | 21.1 | 40.9% |
| Publication years | Publications | Average FWCI | Top 10% publications | Share Top 10% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 12.9 | 1.23 | 1.0 | 7.7% |
| 2015-2017 | 13.7 | 0.71 | 0.5 | 3.7% |
| 2016-2018 | 17.6 | 0.85 | 0.7 | 4.0% |
| 2017-2019 | 23.0 | 0.78 | 0.9 | 3.9% |
| Total | 36.0 | 0.94 | 1.9 | 5.3% |
This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 33 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 49.6%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
| Publication years | Publications | Average SNIP | Publications in Top 20% journals | Share Top 20% journals |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 10.2 | 1.21 | 3.7 | 35.8% |
| 2015-2017 | 9.8 | 1.22 | 4.4 | 44.9% |
| 2016-2018 | 15.1 | 1.19 | 5.3 | 35.3% |
| 2017-2019 | 19.3 | 1.23 | 7.0 | 36.4% |
| 2018-2020 | 22.1 | 1.22 | 8.7 | 39.6% |
| Total | 36.1 | 1.21 | 13.8 | 38.3% |
| Publication years | Publications | Corporate co-publications | Share corporate | International co-publications | Share international |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 34 | 2 | 5.9% | 10 | 29.4% |
| 2015-2017 | 34 | 2 | 5.9% | 11 | 32.4% |
| 2016-2018 | 45 | 2 | 4.4% | 21 | 46.7% |
| 2017-2019 | 61 | 1 | 1.6% | 32 | 52.5% |
| 2018-2020 | 68 | 2 | 2.9% | 39 | 57.4% |
| Total | 115 | 4 | 3.5% | 54 | 47.0% |
This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 34 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 49.3%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
