Overview

LEARNING IN STEM

Row

Publications in DiVA 2020
(fractional counts)

20.3

WoS coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

43.6 %

Scopus coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

64.8 %

Row

Notes more…

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Overall Web of Science coverage for peer reviewed publications in this unit is poor, 43.6%.

Note that the coverage numbers for Web of Science and Scopus apply to publications in the KTH bibliometric database Bibmet. If a WoS-id or Scoupus-id from DiVA can not be matched in Bibmet, it does not count as covered.

Row

Background

The bibliometric indicators referred are based on publications registered in DiVA. Only publications from currently employed researchers at KTH are included. The rolling nature of this report means that it provides more of a current overview and less of a historic stable trend, since it excludes publications written by researchers that are no longer affiliated to KTH, but have been at some point in time.

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Row

Researchers at the unit

Publication data is available only after login.

Publications in DiVA

LEARNING IN STEM

Row

Fractional count

Publication volume, fractionalized

Publication volume, fractionalized

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 4.2 2.9 4.7 5.1 5.0 6.4 4.6 32.9 57.8% 0.9
Article, other NA NA 0.5 1.0 0.7 2.0 NA 4.2 23.6% 0.2
Conference paper, peer review 2.3 8.3 4.8 5.9 10.4 6.8 7.6 46.0 33.4% 0.5
Conference paper, other 4.1 2.6 4.1 4.4 5.6 6.2 3.0 30.1 0.0% 0.0
Book 0.2 NA NA NA NA NA 0.8 0.9 0.0% 0.2
Anthology (editor) NA NA 0.2 NA 0.3 0.5 NA 1.1 0.0% 0.5
Chapter in book NA 3.2 5.6 1.2 0.8 3.7 3.2 17.7 2.8% 0.5
Proceeding (editor) NA NA 0.6 1.2 0.1 NA 0.2 2.2 0.0% 0.0
Report 1.8 1.0 0.7 NA NA 0.2 1.0 4.8 0.0% 0.0
Doctoral thesis 2.0 1.0 NA 1.0 NA 1.0 NA 5.0 0.0% 0.0
Licentiate thesis NA 1.0 NA NA NA NA NA 1.0 0.0% 0.0

Full count

Publication volume, full count

Publication volume, full count

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 9 5 13 11 9 18 10 75 58.7% 1
Article, other NA NA 1 1 2 2 NA 6 16.7% 0
Conference paper, peer review 5 15 8 17 24 19 16 104 36.5% 0
Conference paper, other 8 6 8 10 10 12 6 60 0.0% 0
Book 1 NA NA NA NA NA 2 3 0.0% 0
Anthology (editor) NA NA 1 NA 1 2 NA 4 0.0% 0
Chapter in book NA 4 11 2 2 12 7 38 2.6% 1
Proceeding (editor) NA NA 2 2 1 NA 2 7 0.0% 0
Report 4 2 1 NA NA 1 1 9 0.0% 0
Doctoral thesis 2 1 NA 1 NA 1 NA 5 0.0% 0
Licentiate thesis NA 1 NA NA NA NA NA 1 0.0% 0

Row

Publication volume

Publication volume

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Citation impact

LEARNING IN STEM

Row

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 3.9 3.9 1.0 2.3 59.6%
2015 2.1 2.9 1.4 0.7 31.7%
2016 2.3 2.6 1.1 1.2 52.7%
2017 4.3 3.0 0.7 3.6 82.7%
2018 9.4 18.8 2.0 3.8 40.9%
Total 22.0 31.2 1.4 11.6 52.8%

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Cf Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 6.6 0.68 0.5 7.6%
2015-2017 4.4 0.79 0.5 11.3%
2016-2018 7.7 0.71 0.0 0.6%
2017-2019 10.3 0.74 0.2 1.9%
Total 16.9 0.71 0.7 4.1%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article, Proceedings paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 6 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 18.5%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 11 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 34.8%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Row

Average field normalized citations (Cf)

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal impact

LEARNING IN STEM

Row

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Journal Cf Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 6.6 0.89 0.6 8.5%
2015-2017 4.4 0.92 0.4 10.0%
2016-2018 7.7 0.84 1.1 14.5%
2017-2019 10.3 0.97 1.9 18.7%
2018-2020 11.7 1.00 2.6 22.6%
Total 19.0 0.97 3.5 18.2%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 11 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 34.8%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Row

Field normalized journal impact (JCf)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

LEARNING IN STEM

Row

Summary

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

Publication years Publications Swedish non-university co-publications Share Swedish non-university International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 14 2 14.3% 3 21.4%
2015-2017 11 3 27.3% 3 27.3%
2016-2018 15 3 20.0% 4 26.7%
2017-2019 23 3 13.0% 10 43.5%
2018-2020 28 5 17.9% 14 50.0%
Total 44 8 18.2% 18 40.9%

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 11 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 37.9%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

International and Swedish non-university co‑publication

Countries and organizations

Co‑publication countries

Co‑publication countries

Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
Ireland 7 7 0 0 0 3.0
United States 7 6 1 0 0 2.1
Norway 4 4 0 0 0 1.2
Denmark 3 3 0 0 0 1.2
Tanzania 3 3 0 0 0 1.0
Finland 5 4 1 0 0 1.0
Italy 5 5 0 0 0 0.9
Germany 4 3 1 0 0 0.7
United Kingdom 5 3 2 0 0 0.6
Greece 3 2 1 0 0 0.4
Republic of Serbia 3 2 1 0 0 0.4
Saudi Arabia 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Belgium 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
China 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
France 2 1 1 0 0 0.2
Singapore 2 1 1 0 0 0.2
Australia 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Canada 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Netherlands 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Brazil 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Japan 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Spain 1 0 1 0 0 0.1

Co‑publication organizations

Co‑publication countries

Organization Organization type Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
Athlone Institute of Technology (AIT) University Other Ireland 6 6 0 0 0 2.7
Stockholm University University Sweden 4 4 0 0 0 1.8
Linnaeus University University Sweden 3 3 0 0 0 1.5
Uppsala University University Sweden 4 4 0 0 0 1.4
University of Agder University Norway 4 4 0 0 0 1.2
University of Dar Es Salaam University Tanzania 3 3 0 0 0 1.0
University of Limerick University Ireland 3 3 0 0 0 1.0
Aalborg University University Denmark 1 1 0 0 0 0.8
Purdue University University United States 2 2 0 0 0 0.8
Knowledge Foundation (KK-stiftelsen) Other Public Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.7
Hofstra University University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Technopolis Group Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Petestep AB Company Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
BioMediTech Institute Finland 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
University of Copenhagen University Denmark 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
National Technical University of Athens University Greece 3 2 1 0 0 0.4
University of Belgrade University Republic of Serbia 3 2 1 0 0 0.4
CAG Novus NA Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
University of Naples Federico II University Italy 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
Albaha University University Saudi Arabia 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of Helsinki University Finland 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Wallenius Marine AB Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of Trieste University Italy 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
Robert Gordon University (RGU) University United Kingdom 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
DNV GL Company Germany 2 1 1 0 0 0.3
Mälardalen University College University College Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Seaware AB Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Catholic University of Leuven University Belgium 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology University Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Polytechnic University of Turin University Italy 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Trinity College, Dublin University Ireland 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Karolinska Institutet University Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Nanjing Forestry University University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Scania AB Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Stevens Institute of Technology University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Duisburg-Essen University Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Jyvaskyla University Finland 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Directorate General of Armaments Other Public France 2 1 1 0 0 0.2
Chalmers University of Technology University Sweden 2 1 1 0 0 0.2
University of Lapland University Finland 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Brookes Bell Company United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Nanyang Technological University University Singapore 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Swedish Defence Research Agency Institute Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Gannon University University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Michigan Technological University (MTU) University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of Florida University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of New Hampshire University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Arizona State University University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Charles Sturt University University Australia 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Clemson University University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Delft University of Technology University Netherlands 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Iowa State University University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Linköping University University Sweden 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Pennsylvania State University University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Univ TELUQ University Canada 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
University College London University United Kingdom 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
University of Michigan University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
University of San Diego University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) University Brazil 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Kobe University University Japan 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
NAPA Company Finland 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
National Defense Academy of Japan (NDA) University Japan 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Singapore Institute of Technology (SIT) University Singapore 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
University of A Coruña University Spain 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
University of Strathclyde University United Kingdom 1 0 1 0 0 0.1

Open Access

LEARNING IN STEM

Row

Open Access publications, full counts

Open Access publications, full counts

Publication Year Publications Open Access publications OA gold OA hybrid OA green OA bronze Not OA Share OA
2014 7 1 0 0 1 0 6 14.3%
2015 6 2 0 0 1 1 4 33.3%
2016 20 5 3 0 1 1 15 25.0%
2017 14 7 1 0 5 1 7 50.0%
2018 20 8 2 0 3 3 12 40.0%
2019 32 24 4 13 6 1 8 75.0%
2020 24 13 0 11 2 0 11 54.2%
Total 123 60 10 24 19 7 63 48.8%

Row

Notes more…

The Open Access type of the publications was fetched from the Unpaywall REST API. The method to determine the OA type is presented here.

In summary, the different OA types can be described as follows:

  • Gold: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is fully OA.

  • Hybrid: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is not fully OA.

  • Green: The full text has been found in an institutional repository, such as DiVA.

  • Bronze: The full text has been found on a publisher website but no OA license could be identified.

N.B.: This table is based on peer-reviewed publications for which Unpaywall could determine the OA type (necessary condition: have a DOI number). Unpaywall’s method is empirical and does not strictly equate to copyright license. As a consequence, the OA status of a given publication may vary with time — for example turning from “Not OA” to “Green” when a full text is added to DiVA.

Row

Overview of Open Access publications - piechart

Stacked area chart for publications

Scopus

LEARNING IN STEM

Row

Citation Impact

Column

Citations, open window
Citations, open window
Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 6.1 82.5 13.6 3.2 52.1%
2015 5.4 35.4 6.5 2.0 36.9%
2016 5.0 25.1 5.0 1.6 31.7%
2017 6.1 13.2 2.2 1.8 30.1%
2018 9.4 35.0 3.7 3.9 41.2%
2019 11.0 20.9 1.9 4.0 35.8%
2020 8.5 11.2 1.3 4.6 55.0%
Total 51.5 223.3 4.3 21.1 40.9%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Conference Paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 8 (full counted) publications with poor Scopus coverage (at least 44.5%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
Average field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Publication years Publications Average FWCI Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 12.9 1.23 1.0 7.7%
2015-2017 13.7 0.71 0.5 3.7%
2016-2018 17.6 0.85 0.7 4.0%
2017-2019 23.0 0.78 0.9 3.9%
Total 36.0 0.94 1.9 5.3%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 33 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 49.6%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal Impact

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Publication years Publications Average SNIP Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 10.2 1.21 3.7 35.8%
2015-2017 9.8 1.22 4.4 44.9%
2016-2018 15.1 1.19 5.3 35.3%
2017-2019 19.3 1.23 7.0 36.4%
2018-2020 22.1 1.22 8.7 39.6%
Total 36.1 1.21 13.8 38.3%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 33 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 49.6%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
Field normalized journal impact (SNIP)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
Publication years Publications Corporate co-publications Share corporate International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 34 2 5.9% 10 29.4%
2015-2017 34 2 5.9% 11 32.4%
2016-2018 45 2 4.4% 21 46.7%
2017-2019 61 1 1.6% 32 52.5%
2018-2020 68 2 2.9% 39 57.4%
Total 115 4 3.5% 54 47.0%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 34 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 49.3%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

International and corporate co‑publication

About

Row